Thursday, February 25, 2010

COP-OUT "Rock out with your Glock out"

Photobucket

I was lucky enough to attend an advanced screening of Cop-Out this week. I am predisposed to Kevin Smiths usual trash filled films and I totally love every ounce of garbage that comes out of his characters mouths! Cop-Out however, was NOT written by K Smith, and guess what? I still enjoyed the hell out of it. Alot like Shutter Island, this film has a lot of buzz going on about it, but not for the same reasons as Shutter Island. The verbal holocaust lies in who else? Kevin Smith! Poor Robb and Mark Cullen who actually DID write the screenplay...or maybe not, maybe K Smith's heat will turn out to be for the best. If you think about it, if the film does well, the Cullen's (Sorry Twi-hards, wrong Cullen's) can quite possibly thank the slack administered to Smith's ego for getting movie goers into see the film. On the other hand, if the film tanks, they can blame the verbal diarrhea floating around Smith. I won't get into all the rumors and specs surround the so called "timing" involved with the premier of the film, google it, it's there!

I was thoroughly entertained throughout the movie. First off, the film looked like it was just a blast to film, which always gets me pumped and excited.

EXHIBIT A
Photobucket

The film opens with a flippin' hysterical "homage" to crime based cinematography. It was brilliant, Willis and Morgan had the theater in stitches. The film has hysterical one liners and pokes fun at Willis as well as has some classic Smith references. Some of the Smith references made me wonder how many people in the packed theater would actually "get" them...let me tell you, A LOT! Was the film "authentic" and/or believable? Hell to the no! I mean come on, can you take this seriously??

Photobucket

The reviews for the film that I have looked at, not so good...

EXHIBIT B

"Cop Out" is a clumsy postmodern buddy cop flick that stuffs as many genre references as it can into the ceaseless patter between Tracy Morgan and Bruce Willis. SOURCE-Yahoo Movies

EXHIBIT C

"Cop Out is pretty funny...for the first 20 minutes. After that, it totally disintegrates into a generic buddy movie that could have had any two actors in the lead and gotten the same results."

EXHIBIT D

Cop Out fizzles out once the action scenes kick in. In fact, it might have been a better film had the action scenes been booted in favor of more time spent concentrating on the human elements. It also might have worked better had the two leads, Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan, had even the tiniest bit of chemistry. They don't, and the film suffers for it. SOURCE-Rebecca's Hollywood Movies Blog

EXHIBIT E

An homage to the '80s buddy-cop comedy, right down to the Harold Faltermeyer synth score, the extensively ad-libbed "Cop Out" doesn't cop out on talking the talk, but it falls down on the job whenever it comes to walking the walk. SOURCE-Hollywood Reporter

AND EXHIBIT F U

He didn’t write it as he does with the rest of his movies, however, and that appears to be part of the problem. (Referring to K Smith) SOURCE-Personal Money Store

Man, the Cullen's can't seem to get a break, I mean, first the movie gets bashed, Smith gets a bunch of hell, then they bash the Cullen's writing...which by the way, I thought it was well written and really funny! Definitely a movie to go to with a group of friends. The one thing that has gotten all around positive feedback was the NY premier, of course star studded....

Photobucket
Photobucket

It looks like the two stars had chemistry to me...I totally object to Rebecca's Hollywood Movies Blog in that aspect.

Listen, I think people forget what this type of movie is a platform for...it's not chopping for an Oscar, it's not a thought provoking tale with a plot twist or a surprise ending...lets can the BS and remember that this is a film which is meant for FUN, Smith doesn't take the crap thrown at him too seriously, and that's the point of a film like this. It's a raunchy type comedy...If you want a few hours of funny, entertaining BS go see this film. Willis and Morgan are hysterical together, Michelle Trachtenberg was also very funny and don't be offended by the fact that her humor lies in a language barrier, and Sean William Scott was ridiculously funny!
And hey, Nanny Cams are always funny right?

Photobucket

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Shutter Island



Shutter I did, and not in a good way. I was prepared for a Scorsese master piece, but instead was left with pieces of a master. Parts of this film were absolutely fantastic, other parts, left me very disappointed. The marketing strategy for this film was needless to say, brilliant. The images floating around the web and the teaser trailers we have all been clinging to for over a year now, definitely did their job in bringing people to see this film. Maybe that's what makes it so disappointing. The most interesting thing about the film, to me, are the mixed reviews its gotten from movie goers. It appears that this is one flick that you either love, or hate. And what better breeding ground for the average movie goers review? Twitter of course. Some of the mixed reviews I keep seeing in the ol' tweeters den:

All THOSE IN FAVOR OF SHUTTER ISLAND:
"Bravo Martin Scorsese for pullin off that genious movie #shutterisland, it was fucking amazing how every single thing played out so perfect!"

"Shutter Island is a slow, methodical, and claustrophobic thriller... and I loved every minute of it! #shutterIsland"

"#shutterisland you must go. It will mind eff you.. And end up on your top ten fav list. Trust."

"Shutter Island was pretty good. real weird at some points. crazy twist. go see it."

AND THOSE OPPOSED:
"#ShutterIsland ??? DUMB!!!!!! I don't get how people loved it so much? It was so lame...definitley a let down. I want my $6 back!"

"Okay sooo #ShutterIsland NO GO!!"

"Dude. Scorsese's worst that I know of. And one of the worst I've seen in a while. Jesus. #shutterisland"

I definitely fall under the category of those opposed. Everyone's heard tale of a crazy plot twist and ending to the flick, let me just start by saying, I knew what was going on from about 10 minutes into the film and for the next 2 hours and 20 minutes kept hoping I was wrong. I can't say too much here because I don't want to give anything away for those who haven't seen it, but I keep seeing comments on Twitter and Facebook that are insinuating confusion and shock:

"#shutterisland Geeeez!! Speechless.. Too confusing and too shocking.."

(This one came from Tanedra Howard, my girl from SAW VI and Scream Queens, love her, but must disagree) "Tattoo hated Shutter Island & said it was "too much mind" dawg. wht did U think?<-- I agree fully. I had a damn migrane!"

I didn't find a single moment of the film shocking, or confusing. Not one little bit. So when I saw the following comment, it really made me laugh:

"Funny how movies like #ShutterIsland clearly distinguish the intelligent from the clueless on Twitter."

And incidentally, I completely disagree with the following comment:

"The majority of negative reviews for Shutter Island come from people who are too dumb to follow the plot GO SEE IT!!"

I for one was not "too dumb" to follow the plot, I was rather, bored by the plot because to me, it was something that has been done before, nothing shocking, nothing confusing, and I was quite surprised to hear that some people had a hard time following the story. So a comment like the next one, is definitely on the same page as my review:

"SHUTTER ISLAND: Not the best Scorsese.Nothing new.No surprises.Simple.Boring even."

And with all the reviews and what not floating around, I gave my 2 cents to my best friend, and he had pretty much figured out the "big plot twist" based on a single poster for the film:

Photobucket

I may sound like I'm being pretty harsh on the film and its director, but let me redeem myself a little bit here by saying, there were many aspects to the film that I did in fact enjoy a lot. The camera work, absolutely brilliantly shot, I mean come on, it's Scorsese. Mark Ruffalo and Leonardo DiCaprio, I think they both acted amazingly and there were many side characters that supported the atmosphere of the film to a T. There were some definite "creepy" moments in the film, which is always a fun aspect to a thriller. Visually, this film has some amazing imagery. And the writing, neglecting the BIG SURPRISE, was actually quite great. Whether or not I figured out what was going on has no relevance to the dialogue spoken, and it was very well written, much like the book by Dennis Lehane (which is reported to be a huge seller in the Kindle marketplace right now).

All in all, I would have to say that people should definitely see this movie, if for no other reason than to get involved in the debate on whether or not it was confusing, surprising, shocking, wonderful, or whatever other adjectives are buzzing around this film. For me, not a winner. I don't think people nowadays can be caught too much by surprise, I think movies like THE SIXTH SENSE and THE OTHERS kind of smartened audiences a little too much, so now it's hard to pull off a sick plot twist in the end, but God bless Hollywood for continuing to try to outsmart the paying audience!